Dog bites can result in severe physical injuries, emotional trauma, and financial burdens for the victim. In Maryland, the laws surrounding dog bites place a considerable amount of responsibility on dog owners. Understanding the legal framework is essential for both dog owners and victims of dog bites. Maryland has adopted specific laws that determine liability in the event of a dog attack, and these laws aim to protect the public from dangerous animals while also balancing the rights of pet owners. This comprehensive overview of liability and owner responsibilities sheds light on how Maryland law handles dog bite cases, what factors can affect a claim, and what steps victims can take to seek compensation for their injuries.
Founding Partner Founding Partner Attorney Attorney Attorney
Michael J.
Schreyer
Andrew D.
Alpert
Christopher
Murphy
Michael
Berman
Michael
McCubbin
The issue of liability in dog bite cases is complex, with various factors playing a role in determining whether the owner of the dog will be held responsible for the damages caused by the bite. Maryland law has evolved over the years, and there are specific statutes that govern dog bite claims in the state. This includes a mixture of common law principles and statutory rules, which ultimately aim to provide a fair resolution in cases where someone is injured by a dog. While strict liability rules apply in some cases, there are also defenses available to dog owners that may limit or eliminate their responsibility for a dog bite.
Strict Liability for Dog Bites in Maryland
Maryland follows a rule of strict liability when it comes to dog bites, which means that a dog owner can be held responsible for injuries caused by their dog, regardless of whether the dog has shown any prior signs of aggression. This rule was established in response to the growing number of dog bite cases and the need to ensure that victims are able to recover compensation for their injuries without the burden of proving that the owner was negligent. Under this rule, if a dog bites someone, the owner is presumed to be liable unless they can prove one of the defenses available under Maryland law.
Amazing firm. Went above and beyond in making me feel welcomed, informed, and at ease considering the serious reasons for me being there. It was my first time dealing with something like this and it was comforting knowing I had a whole team behind me working to get the best outcome possible which they did. Highly recommend this firm to anyone looking for a good reliable lawyer who will work with you and be considerate of your well being.” - Daniel Torres
The strict liability standard means that even if a dog has never bitten anyone before or shown any signs of being dangerous, the owner may still be held accountable for the damages caused by the bite. This is a significant departure from older laws, which required victims to prove that the owner knew or should have known that their dog was dangerous. The current law simplifies the process for victims by allowing them to recover compensation more easily. However, strict liability does not apply in every situation. There are exceptions to this rule, which can relieve the owner of responsibility under certain circumstances.
Defenses Available to Dog Owners
While strict liability generally applies to dog bite cases in Maryland, dog owners are not without defenses. One of the primary defenses available to dog owners is the claim that the victim was trespassing at the time of the attack. Maryland law allows dog owners to avoid liability if the bite occurred while the victim was unlawfully on the owner’s property. In such cases, the dog owner may argue that they should not be held responsible for the actions of their dog since the victim was not legally allowed to be on the premises. This defense, however, does not apply in all cases, particularly if the victim was a child or if there was an invitation or implied consent for the victim to be on the property.
Another potential defense is the provocation of the dog. If the owner can demonstrate that the victim provoked the dog into attacking, this may absolve them of liability. Provocation can include actions such as teasing, hitting, or otherwise aggravating the dog in a way that causes the animal to react aggressively. The burden of proving provocation rests with the dog owner, and it is not always easy to establish. Courts will consider the specific circumstances of the case and whether the victim’s actions were reasonably likely to provoke a dog into biting. Additionally, the age and mental capacity of the victim may be taken into account when determining whether provocation occurred.
Verdicts & Settlements
Negligence and Owner Responsibilities
In addition to strict liability, Maryland also allows dog bite claims to be pursued under a theory of negligence. Negligence occurs when a dog owner fails to take reasonable steps to prevent their dog from causing harm to others. In dog bite cases, this could mean that the owner did not properly secure their dog, allowed it to roam freely without supervision, or failed to warn others about the dog’s aggressive tendencies. If a victim can prove that the owner was negligent in handling or controlling their dog, they may be entitled to recover damages for their injuries. Negligence-based claims require the victim to show that the owner’s failure to act reasonably led to the dog bite.
Dog owners in Maryland are expected to take certain precautions to prevent their dogs from posing a danger to others. This includes keeping the dog on a leash when in public, properly restraining the dog in their home or yard, and warning visitors about the presence of a potentially dangerous dog. Failure to meet these responsibilities can result in a finding of negligence, even if the dog has not previously shown signs of aggression. Dog owners are also expected to comply with local leash laws and other ordinances designed to protect the public from dangerous animals. When these laws are violated, and someone is injured as a result, the owner may be held liable for the damages caused by their dog.
Contributory Negligence in Maryland Dog Bite Cases
Maryland follows the doctrine of contributory negligence, which can have a significant impact on dog bite cases. Under this rule, if the victim is found to have contributed to the dog bite in any way, they may be barred from recovering any compensation for their injuries. This means that if the victim was partially at fault for the incident, such as by ignoring warnings about the dog or engaging in behavior that provoked the attack, they may not be able to hold the owner liable for the damages. Contributory negligence is a strict standard, and even a small amount of fault on the part of the victim can prevent them from recovering compensation.
Because contributory negligence can serve as a complete bar to recovery, it is often used by dog owners as a defense in dog bite cases. Victims need to be aware of this rule when pursuing a claim and should work closely with legal representation to ensure that their actions do not jeopardize their ability to recover damages. In some cases, contributory negligence may not apply, particularly if the victim was a child or if the owner’s negligence was egregious. It is important for victims to understand how this rule works and what impact it may have on their case.
75% of people who are injured due to someone else's negligence don't believe they could pursue an injury claim. 95% of personal injury cases are settled pretrial. Typically, only about five percent of personal injury claims will go to trial. $0 is the amount it will cost you to contact us and start your personal injury claim. Reach out for a free consultation.Personal Injury Statistics
Steps to Take After a Dog Bite
If you or someone you love has been bitten by a dog in Maryland, it is crucial to take immediate action to protect your legal rights. The first step is to seek medical attention for the injuries. Even minor bites can lead to serious infections or other complications, so it is essential to have the wound properly treated by a healthcare professional. Once you have received medical care, it is important to document the incident by gathering evidence such as photographs of the injuries, witness statements, and any information about the dog and its owner. This documentation will be valuable if you decide to pursue a legal claim for your injuries.
Victims should also report the dog bite to the local animal control authorities. This helps ensure that the incident is properly documented and that any dangerous dogs are kept under control to prevent future attacks. Depending on the severity of the bite and the circumstances surrounding the incident, animal control may take further action, such as requiring the dog to be quarantined or even euthanized if it poses a significant threat to public safety. Reporting the bite also creates an official record of the incident, which can be useful in a legal claim.
Understanding who is liable for a dog bite in Maryland and what responsibilities fall on the dog owner can be challenging without proper legal guidance. The state’s strict liability rules place a significant burden on dog owners to ensure their pets do not harm others, but there are defenses available that can affect the outcome of a claim. For victims, navigating the complexities of Maryland’s dog bite laws can be overwhelming, especially when dealing with injuries and recovery. Seeking legal representation is essential in these cases to ensure that victims receive the compensation they deserve.
If you or someone you know has been injured in a dog bite incident, Alpert Schreyer, LLC is here to help. Our team of dedicated attorneys can provide the legal support you need to pursue a claim and recover the damages you are entitled to. Contact us today to schedule a consultation and take the first step towards securing the compensation you deserve for your injuries.