When a person is hurt by a defective product, it can be overwhelming to figure out what went wrong and who is responsible. In Maryland, people who have been injured by a dangerous or defective product have the right to seek justice. Proving fault in product liability cases is a crucial part of this process. This is where the person making the claim must show that the product caused their injuries and that someone else, like a manufacturer or seller, is responsible.
Understanding how to prove fault in product liability cases involves knowing the key elements needed to support a claim. These cases are complex and involve many different parts, but it can be broken down into several important areas. This is essential because when a person is injured, they want to focus on their recovery, not the legal details. However, knowing these important elements can give injured individuals a clearer idea of what to expect in their case. At, Alpert Schreyer, LLC , we are here to guide you through the legal process and help you navigate the complexities of your case.
Understanding Product Liability
Product liability is the area of law that deals with holding manufacturers and sellers responsible for injuries caused by their products. When a product is made, sold, or distributed, it must be safe for the people who will use it. This applies to all kinds of products, from toys to electronics to medical devices. When a product has a defect and causes injury, the person who is hurt can bring a legal claim. In Maryland, these cases allow individuals to seek compensation for their injuries, medical costs, and other related damages.
A product liability case can be based on different types of claims, such as defective manufacturing, defective design, or failure to provide adequate warnings. These are known as different “theories” of liability. Proving fault in these cases means showing that the product was defective in some way and that the defect caused the injury.
Essential Elements in a Product Liability Case
To win a product liability case in Maryland, there are several important elements that must be proven. Each of these is essential for building a strong case and convincing a court that the product was at fault for the injury. Without these elements, it can be difficult to hold the manufacturer or seller responsible.
First, the injured person must show that the product was defective. This can happen in a few ways. A product might have a defect because of how it was manufactured. For example, if a car has a faulty brake system, that could be considered a manufacturing defect. In other cases, the defect might be in the product’s design. Even if the product is made correctly, if the design itself is dangerous, that can cause harm. Lastly, if a product does not come with the proper instructions or warnings, it can be defective in that way. This is known as a “failure to warn.”
Once the defect has been identified, the injured person must show that the defect caused their injury. This is called causation. It is not enough to simply say that the product was defective; the defect must be the reason for the injury. For example, if a person uses a lawnmower that has a defect in its blades and is hurt while using it, they would need to show that the defect in the blades is what caused their injury. If the injury happened for another reason, the case might not be successful.
Another essential element is proving that the injured person was using the product as intended. This means that the product must have been used in a normal way when the injury occurred. If a product is misused or used in a way that it was not designed for, it can be harder to prove fault. For instance, if someone uses a power tool without following the instructions and is injured, it might be difficult to hold the manufacturer responsible.
Amazing firm. Went above and beyond in making me feel welcomed, informed, and at ease considering the serious reasons for me being there. It was my first time dealing with something like this and it was comforting knowing I had a whole team behind me working to get the best outcome possible which they did. Highly recommend this firm to anyone looking for a good reliable lawyer who will work with you and be considerate of your well being.”
- Daniel Torres
Types of Defects in Product Liability Cases
As mentioned before, there are three main types of defects in product liability cases. Understanding these different types of defects can help make sense of the case and how fault is proven.
A manufacturing defect happens when there is a mistake in how the product was made. This could be a problem in the factory or during the assembly process. Even if the design of the product is safe, if something goes wrong during the making of the product, it can lead to dangerous defects. For example, if a batch of children’s toys is made with harmful chemicals because of an error in the manufacturing process, that would be considered a manufacturing defect.
A design defect is different from a manufacturing defect because it means that the product was made exactly as planned, but the design itself is dangerous. This could mean that the product is likely to cause harm even when used properly. An example of a design defect might be a car with a top-heavy design that makes it more likely to tip over during normal use.
Lastly, a defect can happen when there are not enough warnings or instructions provided with the product. Some products, like chemicals or machines, can be dangerous if not used properly. If the manufacturer or seller does not provide clear warnings or instructions, the product can become hazardous. This is called a “failure to warn” defect. For example, if a cleaning product is sold without warnings about how to safely handle it, and someone is injured because they did not know how to use it safely, the manufacturer could be held responsible.
Related Videos
Value of a Personal Injury Case
Choosing a Personal Injury Attorney
Who Can Be Held Responsible?
In a product liability case, there are several different parties that can be held responsible for a defective product. The manufacturer is often the first place to look when trying to prove fault, but other parties may also be at fault. This can include distributors, wholesalers, or even retailers who sold the product.
Manufacturers are responsible for designing and making the product, so they are usually the first party considered when a product is defective. If the product is found to have a design defect, for example, the manufacturer could be held responsible for that. Similarly, if a product was made with a manufacturing defect, the manufacturer would likely be at fault.
Distributors and sellers can also be held responsible in some cases. If a distributor sells a product that they know is defective, or if they fail to inspect the product before selling it, they might also be held accountable. Retailers who sell dangerous products without proper warnings or instructions can also be held liable in a product liability case.
It is important to identify all the parties who might be responsible for the defective product, as this can increase the chances of winning the case and receiving fair compensation. In some cases, multiple parties may share the blame for the injury.
The Role of Negligence and Strict Liability
There are two main legal concepts that apply to product liability cases: negligence and strict liability. These are different ways to prove fault, and they can have a big impact on how the case moves forward.
Negligence means that a party did not take reasonable care when designing, making, or selling the product. If the injured person can show that the manufacturer or seller was careless and that this carelessness caused the defect, they can prove negligence. For example, if a toy company did not properly test its products for safety, and a child was injured, the company might be found negligent.
Verdicts & Settlements
Strict liability is a different legal concept. Under strict liability, it does not matter if the manufacturer or seller was careful or not. If the product was defective and caused injury, they can still be held responsible. This means that the injured person does not have to prove that anyone was careless; they just need to prove that the product was defective and caused harm.
In Maryland, strict liability can be an important part of product liability cases. This can make it easier for injured people to recover compensation, as they do not have to focus on proving that the manufacturer or seller was negligent.
Proving fault in a product liability case can be a difficult and complicated process. These cases involve many different elements and legal theories, and the outcome can depend on the specific facts of the case. Injured individuals may find it challenging to navigate the legal system on their own, especially while recovering from their injuries.
At Alpert Schreyer, LLC, we are committed to helping people in Maryland who have been injured by defective products. Our team understands the complexities of product liability cases and knows what it takes to prove fault and get the compensation you deserve. If you or a loved one has been injured by a defective product, we are here to help guide you through the legal process and fight for your rights.
For more information or to discuss your case, contact Alpert Schreyer, LLC today. We are ready to provide the support and guidance you need to pursue justice.